How to Stop Islamization

There is a simple and effective solution to the problem of Islamization that can not only stop Muslim immigration, but also reverse the process

 

Contents

• Islam as a threat to the existence of European Civilization

• What needs to be done to stop Islamization?

• Are there legal grounds for Banning Islam?

• Conclusion

• References

Islam as a threat to the existence of European Civilization

Throughout history, European civilization has repeatedly endured revolutions, wars, and brutal regimes, leading to the mass extermination of its finest representatives and the destruction of great cultural monuments. However, none of these historical blows threatened the foundations of civilization.

But since the mid-20th century, European civilization has faced a unique challenge that threatens its very existence. This challenge involves two processes:

• mass immigration of anti-civilizational ethnic groups from Asia and Africa; and

• Islamization, since the overwhelming majority of migrants are Muslim.

The first process leads to the replacement of the peoples of the European race by anti-civilizational ethnic groups, the second to the spread of Islam in the European space.

The anti-civilizational nature of Islam was described back in the early 20th century by the French orientalist Andre Servier in his book “Islam and the Psychology of Muslims“:

“Islam was not a torch but an extinguisher. Conceived in a barbarous brain for a barbarous people, it was — and it remains — incapable of adapting itself to civilization. Wherever it has dominated, it has broken the impulse towards progress and checked the evolution of society.” [1]

Moreover, Muslim migration brings with it crime and terror, intolerance of other religions and dissenters, contempt for women and the human person, tribal customs, and Sharia law. As a result, civilized populations are forced to leave areas with high Muslim concentrations.

Evgeny Gilbo spoke about the scale of the impending catastrophe in his lecture:

“Europe is rapidly being flooded with ethnically alien elements. They form pockets of chaos that gradually expand, capturing ever new territories. Over time, the migrants will establish their own cultural hegemony and displace the indigenous population — exterminating or assimilating them.” [2]

Today, Europe is repeating the fate of the Christian Middle East, where the indigenous Christian population has either become an oppressed minority, as in Egypt, or been completely annihilated by Muslim invaders, as in Syria and Iraq.

What needs to be done to stop Islamization?

How can we avoid the impending catastrophe? Is it possible to stop the destructive process of Islamization?

The answer is Yes. This process can be stopped and even reversed.

To achieve this, only one measure is necessary: ​​a legal ban on Islam.

The fact is that Islamic law contains a provision according to which a Muslim who is unable to openly practice Islam, observe obligatory religious precepts and preserve his faith is obliged to perform “hijra“ – move to a country where he can freely practice his religion.

The prohibition of practicing Islam refers to the prohibition of obligatory prayer, fasting, Islamic dress, religious education of children, and public professing of Islam.

The provision on hijra is based on the Quranic verse 4:97:

“Those whom the Angels take, while they had wronged their souls; they said: What situation were you in, they said: We were oppressed on Earth. They said: Was God’s Earth not wide enough that you could emigrate in it to these their abode will be Hell; what a miserable destiny!”

And also on the following hadiths:

“I am not responsible for any Muslim who stays among polytheists.” (Sunan Abi Dawud, 2645)

“Migration will not end until repentance ends…” (Sunan Abi Dawud, 2479)

The effectiveness of restrictive measures against Islam has been demonstrated by the experience of France, which adopted:

• a 2004 law banning ostentatious religious symbols in public schools, including the hijab; [3]

• a 2010 law banning full-face veils in public places, including the niqab. [4]

Even these relatively mild restrictions have led to a significant emigration of some French Muslims to countries where there are no such restrictions. [5]

Thus, banning Islam appears to be a simple and effective solution to the problem of Islamization. It could not only stop Muslim immigration to Europe but also trigger the reverse process — the emigration of Muslims from Europe.

Are there legal grounds for banning Islam?

The next question that needs to be answered is: are there legal grounds for banning Islam?

The answer is Yes. Such grounds exist. Moreover, there is already a legal precedent—the Amsterdam court’s decision of June 23, 2011, acquitting Dutch politician Geert Wilders, who had been accused of inciting hatred by Muslim organizations. [6]

Specifically, Wilders was accused of comparing Islam to fascism and the Quran to Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf.

A renowned Arabist, Dr. Hans Jansen, Professor of Islamic Philosophy at Utrecht University, testified as Wilders’ witness at the trial.

In his testimony, Dr. Jansen stated that:

• The Quran contains more anti-Semitic statements than Mein Kampf;

• The Quran imperatively calls Muslims to violence;

• Jihad—the war for Islamic world domination — is the duty of Muslims;

• There are moderate Muslims, but no moderate Islam;

• There is no fundamental difference between “good” and “bad” Islam;

• The similarity between Islam and fascism lies in the fact that both teachings are intolerant of dissent and call for reprisals against dissenters;

• No other religion strives for dominance as much as Islam. [7]

The court found Dr. Hans Jansen’s testimony convincing and acquitted Geert Wilders of all charges. [6]

Thus, opponents of Islamization received legal confirmation that:

• the main book of Islam — the Quran — is more radical than the main book of Nazism — Mein Kampf;

• Islamic teaching is more radical than the ideology of fascism (which in this case refers to Nazism).

With such a compelling argument, defenders of European civilization have the right to seek a legislative ban on Islam in European countries where Nazism is prohibited by law or whose populations suffered under Nazism.

Conclusion

Naturally, the fight to ban Islam will meet resistance from its European allies, including:

• the British ruling class, which views Islamization as a catalyst for its globalist projects;

• the Fabian Society and its affiliated Labour Party, which initiated and oversaw the Islamization process;

• the Anglo-French Rothschild group, which finances Islamization;

• the left-wing parties of the Socialist International, which are implementing the Fabian Society’s Islamization policies in their countries. [8-14]

However, within every nation in Europe, there are forces ready to defend both the future of their people and of European civilization as a whole. Islam’s European allies call them “populists” and “far-right.”

Therefore, the fate of European civilization depends, first and foremost, on the peoples of Europe themselves—on their will to live, on their choice between life and death. As it says in Deuteronomy:

“I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live.”